Monday, August 17, 2009

Strict Liability for Injuries from Animals

The law in New York State as it relates to dog bites and other injuries caused by animals is that the owner of the animal is strictly liable for injuries caused by the animal if it can be established that the animal had a vicious propensity and that the owner knew of should have known of such propensity. This standard was established by the Court of Appeals (the highest court in the State of New York) in 2004 in the case of COLLIER v. ZAMBITO. Even attorneys who practice in the area of personal injury, but who may not have much familiarity with cases of injuries caused by animals, often do not realize that the case of an animal attack is not one of negligence, but rather strict liability. As a result, there are an unfortunate number of cases which result in an unfavorable outcome to the plaintiff, not because the case is without merit, but because the pleadings in the case were deficient. It is imperative that one injured by a domestic animal consult with an attorney experienced with the law pertaining to such injuries, and familiar with the recent case law.

Vicious propensity of an animal can be proven without showing that the animal, usually a dog, has previously bitten someone else. Contrary to what is commonly believed, THERE IS NO ONE FREE BITE RULE IN NEW YORK!!

3 comments:

  1. Nice post distinguishing negligence from strict liability as applied to animal attacks. I hope to read more of your enlightening posts.

    -ATL
    Personal Injury Blog

    ReplyDelete
  2. Animal attacks most often occur on people's arms. This is particularly risky because hands are inclined to attacks. Hands get less blood than other areas of your body, which creates it hard for blood to come via and battle the disease.

    auto accident lawyer milwaukee

    ReplyDelete
  3. Everyone should take responsibility with their own pets. If you happen to be victim, you have the right to claim personal injury compensation.

    ReplyDelete